clickd vs Teamwork
Project management built for client work. Here's how they compare for dev teams managing scope and shipping on time.
Our verdict
Teamwork gets client-facing project management right in many ways. But when your client scopes in a new feature mid-project, Teamwork has no formal mechanism to gate, approve, or reject that change before it disrupts your sprint.
Feature comparison
What Teamwork does well
- Built specifically for client-facing work
- Time tracking and billing features
- Client access controls
- Milestone and deadline tracking
Where clickd wins
- No formal change request approval workflow
- Dated interface compared to modern tools
- Expensive per-user pricing
- Heavy feature set can slow teams down
- Not optimized for sprint-based dev workflows
Common questions
Does Teamwork have change request approvals?
Teamwork does not have a formal change request approval workflow. Scope changes in Teamwork happen through task creation, messages, or comments — without a structured approval step. clickd builds this gate into the workflow: every scope change is submitted as a formal change request, reviewed by stakeholders, and either approved or rejected with documentation.
Is clickd a good alternative to Teamwork for agencies?
Yes. clickd offers a client portal for stakeholder visibility, formal change request approvals, iteration planning, and Gantt charts — all the tools agencies need for client delivery, with a more focused and modern interface than Teamwork.
Is clickd cheaper than Teamwork?
clickd offers a free tier with no time limit, and paid plans are designed to be more affordable than Teamwork's per-user pricing. Our Free plan supports up to 5 members and 3 projects — no credit card required.
Ready to protect your sprint?
Free to start. No credit card required. Switch from Teamwork in minutes.